Final Rule GI Pricing Practices

Final Rule GI Pricing Practices

You will have seen that on 28th May 2021 the FCA published its paper on pricing rules in the GI Market. This follows several years’ work from the regulator to address the harms suffered by loyal customers of home and motor insurance providers.

New ruling

It has long been the case that regulated firms have a duty to treat their customers fairly, however the work performed by the regulator has shown that in many cases this has not been delivered in the GI space. The most prominent change that the FCA brings in is that firms will no longer be able to slash new business premiums in order to attract new customers, only to penalise them in subsequent years with hugely inflated prices which bear little resemblance to the actual cost of providing the policy. This unfair profiteering has become known as ‘Price Walking’ and it will be banned from the start of 2022, removing the need for customers to outwit insurance providers and move their polices year on year in order to get a fair deal.

As we know, price is only part of the story and there is a raft of new rules on product governance which take effect from September 2021, meaning firms must test the products they provide for “value” on a regular basis.

Key considerations

There are some key considerations for distributors and firms as a result of the FCA’s recent moves. This will include having a clear understanding of GI provider panels value proposition and whether or not these providers have undertaken the practice of price walking your customers, whom will probably have paid a financial penalty for their loyalty. In the case of legacy back books there is also a strong likelihood that some customers will be holding policies that are outdated, have not benefited from product development and would not pass any of the tests that the FCA has introduced.

The ultimate aim for the regulator is to create consistent pricing; this may well mean the end of cheap deals in the first year, but it will bring about a more sustainable ongoing insurance bill for the customer who will have a better idea how much their home insurance costs year on year.

What this means for advisers

For advisory firms, the new rules will mean that, as price will no longer be the sole representation of value, the profession can lead the insurance conversation without the traditional sensitivity on first-year prices. It’s a significant opportunity to reclaim intermediary market share from price comparison sites which had become more successful when new business pricing competition became artificially more aggressive.

Share this

Recent Posts

The unethical practice of price walking

The unethical practice of price walking

By Martin Schultheiss

Most are familiar now with the FCA’s intention to ban the practice of price walking for general insurance but, with the rules still in consultation, should advisory firms sit back and wait for the proposed ban to come into effect, or be acting with more urgency?

The FCA’s proposal to prevent insurers from price walking will mean that every customer will be offered a new business price at renewal. This would outlaw a practice which has helped providers pocket an extra £1.2bn in fees from six million policyholders it identified in October 2019, as paying high or very high premiums.

Price has always been the dominant factor in any insurance purchase decision and although a low price doesn’t necessarily translate to good value, it’s easy to assume when comparing like for like cover across multiple insurance providers, that the cheapest price may seem like the best option.

However, in the interim of any regulation, Boards and Senior Managers should take some time to consider their customers best interests in relation to how they are comparing these policies. The reality is that what appears to be the cheapest first-year price, may ultimately become a bad deal if not calculated over the lifetime of the policy.

Uinsure has never price walked. This strategy has been under pressure given the nature of a very competitive market, but our practice and offering has remained consistent since our inception in 2007.

It’s an ethical standpoint that we believe is fairer and more transparent for customers, while ensuring a better outcome. Of course, refusing to price walk has occasionally meant that our first-year prices might be slightly higher than those of our competitors, but our fair pricing strategy has meant that prices are consistent and honest with no hidden fees and, therefore, representing fairer value of the lifetime of the policy.

As we move forward, our strategy will remain the same for what we believe is the ultimate benefit of the end customer and this will ensure all of our customers are treated fairly, in return for the trust they put in us.

Share this

Recent Posts